Dracula and Philosophy

Dying to Know

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Dracula and Philosophy by , Open Court
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780812698954
Publisher: Open Court Publication: July 14, 2015
Imprint: Open Court Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780812698954
Publisher: Open Court
Publication: July 14, 2015
Imprint: Open Court
Language: English

Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows-macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows-macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."

More books from Open Court

Cover of the book Cutting Jesus Down to Size by
Cover of the book Baseball and Philosophy by
Cover of the book Being and Ambiguity by
Cover of the book Ethical Marxism by
Cover of the book Szasz Under Fire by
Cover of the book Soccer and Philosophy by
Cover of the book Iron Man vs. Captain America and Philosophy by
Cover of the book American Horror Story and Philosophy by
Cover of the book Reading Negri by
Cover of the book Islam in History by
Cover of the book The Red Sox and Philosophy by
Cover of the book Dependent Rational Animals by
Cover of the book Ayn Rand Explained by
Cover of the book The Wire and Philosophy by
Cover of the book Jimmy Buffett and Philosophy by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy