Science in Flux: NASA's Nuclear Program at Plum Brook Station, 1955 - 2005 (NASA SP-2006-4317) - Nuclear Rockets, NERVA, Atomic Airplanes, Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Physics, Nuclear Physics, Astrophysics & Space Science
Cover of the book Science in Flux: NASA's Nuclear Program at Plum Brook Station, 1955 - 2005 (NASA SP-2006-4317) - Nuclear Rockets, NERVA, Atomic Airplanes, Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781465943422
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: March 1, 2012
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781465943422
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: March 1, 2012
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

This official NASA history document - converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction - is a dramatic account of the history of NASA's nuclear reactors at the Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. The book details the origin of the facility and its work supporting efforts to build a nuclear-powered aircraft and nuclear rockets. The author describes the station as a "nuclear relic from NASA's golden age of space exploration."

Testing and research reactors as scientific tools are more common than most people realize, and their history remains largely untold. There is an important distinction between these two types of reactors. A test reactor is one that operates above the 10-megawatt thermal power range, whereas a research reactor operates between 10 kilowatts and 10 megawatts. Power reactors that generate electricity (and operate at much higher power levels) frequently appear in newspaper headlines and are conspicuous because of their size and potential for disaster, whereas research reactors can be quietly tucked away, even located in the midst of a college campus. Since the completion of the first nuclear research reactor in 1942 at the University of Chicago, 672 facilities have been built throughout the world. The United States was the most prolific research reactor-building nation, with 227 sites, followed by the former Soviet Union with 97. These American reactors were constructed by national laboratories (Argonne, Oak Ridge, Brookhaven, and Los Alamos), universities (North Carolina State, Penn State, MIT, etc.), private industry (Westinghouse, General Electric, etc.), and the military. In 1961, the year that the Plum Brook reactor went "critical" (meaning that it was ready to conduct research with a sustained nuclear reaction), there were 120 nuclear research and test reactors in operation in the United States. At 60 megawatts of power, the Plum Brook facility (along with its 100-kilowatt mock-up research reactor) was the second most powerful test reactor in the country, at the time second only to the Engineering Test Reactor at the National Reactor Testing Station near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Worldwide, only the Soviet Union, Britain, and Canada possessed more powerful test reactors than Plum Brook before it went critical.

In 1955 the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) began designing Plum Brook to help support the goal of a nuclear airplane with a nuclear test reactor to enable engineers to conduct materials testing. The advantages of having nuclear propulsion for an airplane were numerous. Most importantly, in an era before ICBMs and conventionally fueled planes that could circumnavigate the globe, a nuclear airplane promised the first chance for the American military to fly from the United States, drop bombs over the Soviet Union, and then return home. But technical and environmental problems overwhelmed the political and military potential of this program. Although John F. Kennedy helped to inspire the dream of nuclear rockets, ironically he also terminated the research program Plum Brook was originally intended to carry out. Kennedy suspended the nuclear airplane program in March 1961, after over $1 billion and 15 years of work. Less than 3 months before the reactor was to start operation, Plum Brook's main research program lost its political support. The public perceived nuclear airplanes as too costly and dangerous, and chemical fuels began providing many of the advantages once thought possible only with nuclear propulsion. This would be the first time that politics dramatically shaped the future of Plum Brook's scientific work. It would not be the last.

Although the government had terminated the nuclear airplane program, Plum Brook and the research potential of its neutron flux still represented a valuable capability.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This official NASA history document - converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction - is a dramatic account of the history of NASA's nuclear reactors at the Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. The book details the origin of the facility and its work supporting efforts to build a nuclear-powered aircraft and nuclear rockets. The author describes the station as a "nuclear relic from NASA's golden age of space exploration."

Testing and research reactors as scientific tools are more common than most people realize, and their history remains largely untold. There is an important distinction between these two types of reactors. A test reactor is one that operates above the 10-megawatt thermal power range, whereas a research reactor operates between 10 kilowatts and 10 megawatts. Power reactors that generate electricity (and operate at much higher power levels) frequently appear in newspaper headlines and are conspicuous because of their size and potential for disaster, whereas research reactors can be quietly tucked away, even located in the midst of a college campus. Since the completion of the first nuclear research reactor in 1942 at the University of Chicago, 672 facilities have been built throughout the world. The United States was the most prolific research reactor-building nation, with 227 sites, followed by the former Soviet Union with 97. These American reactors were constructed by national laboratories (Argonne, Oak Ridge, Brookhaven, and Los Alamos), universities (North Carolina State, Penn State, MIT, etc.), private industry (Westinghouse, General Electric, etc.), and the military. In 1961, the year that the Plum Brook reactor went "critical" (meaning that it was ready to conduct research with a sustained nuclear reaction), there were 120 nuclear research and test reactors in operation in the United States. At 60 megawatts of power, the Plum Brook facility (along with its 100-kilowatt mock-up research reactor) was the second most powerful test reactor in the country, at the time second only to the Engineering Test Reactor at the National Reactor Testing Station near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Worldwide, only the Soviet Union, Britain, and Canada possessed more powerful test reactors than Plum Brook before it went critical.

In 1955 the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) began designing Plum Brook to help support the goal of a nuclear airplane with a nuclear test reactor to enable engineers to conduct materials testing. The advantages of having nuclear propulsion for an airplane were numerous. Most importantly, in an era before ICBMs and conventionally fueled planes that could circumnavigate the globe, a nuclear airplane promised the first chance for the American military to fly from the United States, drop bombs over the Soviet Union, and then return home. But technical and environmental problems overwhelmed the political and military potential of this program. Although John F. Kennedy helped to inspire the dream of nuclear rockets, ironically he also terminated the research program Plum Brook was originally intended to carry out. Kennedy suspended the nuclear airplane program in March 1961, after over $1 billion and 15 years of work. Less than 3 months before the reactor was to start operation, Plum Brook's main research program lost its political support. The public perceived nuclear airplanes as too costly and dangerous, and chemical fuels began providing many of the advantages once thought possible only with nuclear propulsion. This would be the first time that politics dramatically shaped the future of Plum Brook's scientific work. It would not be the last.

Although the government had terminated the nuclear airplane program, Plum Brook and the research potential of its neutron flux still represented a valuable capability.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book Changing Dynamics of the U.S.-China-Latin America Relationship: China's Economic Interest in Latin America, Military Cooperation, U.S. Trade with Mexico, American Foreign Policy Issues by Progressive Management
Cover of the book A Contemporary History of the U.S. Army Nurse Corps: Vietnam War Aftermath, Gender and Minority Issues, Humanitarian Relief, Refugee Operations, Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm, Somalia, Yugoslavia by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Military Planning for a Catastrophic Critical Infrastructure Event: In the Dark, Terminal Blackout: Electric Infrastructure Vulnerabilities and Civil-Military Resiliency, EMP by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century FEMA Study Course: Applying ICS to Healthcare Organizations (IS-200.HCa) - Physicians, Department Managers, Unit Leaders, Charge Nurses, And Hospital Administrators by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 2011 Nuclear Power Plant Sourcebook: Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX), Plutonium Health Effects, Fabrication Facility Documents, Safety Issues, Japanese Accident Crisis Fukushima Reactor Unit 3 by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Iraq: Federal Research Study and Country Profile with Comprehensive Information, History, and Analysis - Politics, Economy, Military, Saddam Hussein by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century NBC Reference Series: Explosives Safety Manual - Operational Safety, Remote Operations, Storms and Static Electricity, Explosive Dust, High Explosives by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century FEMA Study Course: Workplace Security Awareness (IS-906) - Access Control, ID Badges, Scenarios and Procedures, Bomb Threat Checklist, Identity Theft by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Resurgent Russia in 2030: Challenge for the USAF - Alternate Russian Futures, Political, Economic, and Military Background, Rising Power, Friend or Foe, Implications for the American Military by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Bug Stops Here: Force Protection and Emerging Infectious Diseases - Disease through History, Preventable Disease and Non-Battle Injuries, Regional Combatant Commands, From Black Death to Malaria by Progressive Management
Cover of the book At Periscope Depth: Exploring Submarine Proliferation in Southeast Asia - Case Studies of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam - Undersea Diesel Electric Subs, Philippines and Thailand by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Role of Small States in the Post-Cold War Era: The Case of Belarus - President Alexander Lukashenko, Putin, Medvedev, Iranian Relationship, Gas Blackmail, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by Progressive Management
Cover of the book U.S. Air Force Aerospace Mishap Reports: Accident Investigation Boards for A-10 Warthog Close Air Support Aircraft 2011 and 2010, C-17 Globemaster Transport Plane 2010, CV-22 Osprey 2010 by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 2013 Boeing 787 Dreamliner Airplane Lithium Battery Fire NTSB Investigation: Event History, Battery and Component Examinations and Testing, Flight Recorders, Status Reports by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Origins of the "Golden Hour" of Medical Care and its Applicability to Combat Medicine: History of Casualty Care from World War I through Vietnam, Injury and Death in Combat, Evacuation Doctrine by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy