Who is to Judge?

The Perennial Debate Over Whether to Elect or Appoint America's Judges

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, Constitutional
Cover of the book Who is to Judge? by Charles Gardner Geyh, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Charles Gardner Geyh ISBN: 9780190887162
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: February 14, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Charles Gardner Geyh
ISBN: 9780190887162
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: February 14, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a representative democracy. Elected judges take an oath to uphold the law impartially, which calls upon them to swear off the influence of the very constituencies they must cultivate in order to attain and retain judicial office. This paradox has given rise to perennially shrill and unproductive binary arguments over the merits and demerits of elected and appointed judiciaries, which this project seeks to transcend and reimagine. In Who Is to Judge?, judicial politics expert Charles Gardner Geyh exposes and explains the overstatements of both sides in the judicial selection debate. When those exaggerations are understood as such, it becomes possible to search for common ground and its limits. Ultimately, this search leads Geyh to conclude that, while appointive systems are a preferable default, no one system of selection is best for all jurisdictions at all times.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a representative democracy. Elected judges take an oath to uphold the law impartially, which calls upon them to swear off the influence of the very constituencies they must cultivate in order to attain and retain judicial office. This paradox has given rise to perennially shrill and unproductive binary arguments over the merits and demerits of elected and appointed judiciaries, which this project seeks to transcend and reimagine. In Who Is to Judge?, judicial politics expert Charles Gardner Geyh exposes and explains the overstatements of both sides in the judicial selection debate. When those exaggerations are understood as such, it becomes possible to search for common ground and its limits. Ultimately, this search leads Geyh to conclude that, while appointive systems are a preferable default, no one system of selection is best for all jurisdictions at all times.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book The Suicidal Crisis by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Knowing How by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Ethics in Practice by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Democracy to Come by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Let My People Go by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Britain's War: Into Battle, 1937-1941 by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Neuroergonomics by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book The Pygmy Hippo Story by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Indirect Procedures: A Musician's Guide to the Alexander Technique by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Celtic Mythology by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Social Learning Theory: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book The Philosophy of Philip Kitcher by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Roman History: Late Antiquity: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Philosophers without Gods by Charles Gardner Geyh
Cover of the book Parables for Our Time by Charles Gardner Geyh
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy