On Gerhard Richter's Blur Effect. The Ambivalent Character of a Distanced Force

Nonfiction, Art & Architecture, General Art, Art Technique
Cover of the book On Gerhard Richter's Blur Effect. The Ambivalent Character of a Distanced Force by Sarah Doerfel, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sarah Doerfel ISBN: 9783656610182
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 6, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Sarah Doerfel
ISBN: 9783656610182
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 6, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Art - Photography and Film, grade: 78 % = 1, University of Westminster (Department of Media, Arts and Design), course: Photography Dissertation, language: English, abstract: 'The strongest of Richter's effects of withdrawing the work from the viewer's gaze, is the creation of a softening blur as the final touch to all his Photo Paintings. Making the paintings, the artist firstly drafts his subject with a normally sized brush to create a 'sharp' image (Fig.3). Having finished, he would come with a broader brush or a squeegee and blur the still wet oil paint (Fig. 4) to create the photographic effect of an out-of-focus image1. The blur in these paintings is not a trace of movement of the object in the photograph. This blur is an addition to the painting that does not relate to a form of haziness in the specific photographic source image, but to the general idea of vagueness, indecisiveness, anti-definition. Therefore, it mirrors the artist's attitudes towards life in an especially expressive way. The enlargement of the usual distance between what is depicted and the viewer are the basis of this effect. At first on a quite literal level: Richter introduces another layer of depiction in these paintings by creating the depiction of a depiction of an object. This places the object of the painting further away than usual from its maker and us as viewers (Butin, 2010). Secondly, on the level of reception: an image that stays 'out-of-focus' from whichever distance we look at it rejects us, and refuses to communicate. This typical caginess of Richter's paintings, the exclusion of the recipient whom they are made for, is a striking effect in the encounter with these images. The analysis of the antithetic emotional effects of this simple but fascinating painterly technique is the theme of this essay.'

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Art - Photography and Film, grade: 78 % = 1, University of Westminster (Department of Media, Arts and Design), course: Photography Dissertation, language: English, abstract: 'The strongest of Richter's effects of withdrawing the work from the viewer's gaze, is the creation of a softening blur as the final touch to all his Photo Paintings. Making the paintings, the artist firstly drafts his subject with a normally sized brush to create a 'sharp' image (Fig.3). Having finished, he would come with a broader brush or a squeegee and blur the still wet oil paint (Fig. 4) to create the photographic effect of an out-of-focus image1. The blur in these paintings is not a trace of movement of the object in the photograph. This blur is an addition to the painting that does not relate to a form of haziness in the specific photographic source image, but to the general idea of vagueness, indecisiveness, anti-definition. Therefore, it mirrors the artist's attitudes towards life in an especially expressive way. The enlargement of the usual distance between what is depicted and the viewer are the basis of this effect. At first on a quite literal level: Richter introduces another layer of depiction in these paintings by creating the depiction of a depiction of an object. This places the object of the painting further away than usual from its maker and us as viewers (Butin, 2010). Secondly, on the level of reception: an image that stays 'out-of-focus' from whichever distance we look at it rejects us, and refuses to communicate. This typical caginess of Richter's paintings, the exclusion of the recipient whom they are made for, is a striking effect in the encounter with these images. The analysis of the antithetic emotional effects of this simple but fascinating painterly technique is the theme of this essay.'

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Richtlinien Primarstufe und pädagogische Perspektiven by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Modernisierungsprozesse und Nationalismusgenese in Osteuropa im 19. Jahrhundert - Interdisziplinäre Fallanalyse anhand ausgewählter Beispiele: Dalmatien und Galizien by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Business plan of Dehumidifier Corporation of America by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Die deutsch-polnischen Beziehungen von 1918 bis 1933 by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Wende im Weltraum by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Preußens Schicksal: Der Frieden von Tilsit by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Sind NGOs demokratisch legitimierbar? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von amnesty international by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Beyond Budgeting. Darstellung des Beyond-Budgeting-Modells by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Trennung und Scheidung by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Prüfung von Finanzinstrumenten nach IAS 32 und 39 sowie IFRS 7 by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Geschlechtermoral - Die Suche nach einer anderen Stimme by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Cumbia Villera by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Beihilfe zum Suizid und aktive Sterbehilfe im Kontext von Menschenwürde und Autonomie by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Soziale Ungleichheit, Konflikt und Umverteilungsmassnahmen by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Geschlechterordnung im Wandel. Ist die duale Geschlechterordnung noch zeitgemäß? by Sarah Doerfel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy